SUS Spec Aims Post Studio Evaluation-Reviewers Overall Experience(Required)On a scale of 1–5, how would you rate your overall experience as a reviewer in the Specific Aims Studio? (1 = Very Poor, 5 = Excellent) 1 (Poor) 2 3 4 5 (Excellent) Preparation & Expectations(Required)How clear were the expectations and instructions provided to you before the session? Very Clear Somewhat Clear Not Very Clear Not at All Clear Were the materials (e.g., aims pages, guidance) provided in a timely and helpful manner?(Required) Yes Somewhat No Use of Time(Required)Do you feel the time allotted for each presentation and discussion was sufficient? Yes Too Short Too Long If too short or too long, please explain:(Required)Impact and Value(Required)To what extent do you feel your feedback was valued and helpful to the reviewees? (1 = Not at all, 5 = Extremely) 1-Not at All 2 3 4 5-Extremely What did you enjoy most about participating in the Studio?What challenges or frustrations did you experience?How could we improve the reviewer experience in future Studios?Future Participation(Required)Would you be willing to participate as a reviewer again in the future? Yes Maybe No If yes, please provide an email:Additional FeedbackDo you have any other suggestions or comments for improving the SUS Specific Aims Studio?
